Martin C. Evans

Vietnam Vets Troubled By Early Deaths

In Uncategorized on July 26, 2011 at 5:15 pm

From Newsday, Dec. 16, 2010


WHEN Diane Lake began visiting her late husband’s resting place at
Long Island National Cemetery in Farmingdale, she became alarmed by
what she saw nearby: memorial markers that showed many of her
husband’s fellow Vietnam veterans had died even younger than he had.

The markers, spaced along a wall where the ashes of her husband, Spc.
4th Class Robert Lake, and others are interred, indicate which war a
veteran served in, along with rank and branch of service.

Diane Lake is concerned that Vietnam vets are facing early deaths. Her husband, Robert Lake, 65, died last year of skin cancer.

“I would look up on the wall and see this one was only 62 and this
one was only 61, and say to myself these men were pretty young to be
dying already,” said Lake, whose husband was 65 when he died of an
aggressive skin cancer May 13.

Lake, of East Northport, is among an increasingly vocal number of
Vietnam veterans or their loved ones who are questioning whether
participation in the Vietnam War is hastening the deaths of soldiers
who survived it.

John Rowan, of Queens, national president of Vietnam Veterans of
America, said his organization had been frustrated that the
Department of Veterans Affairs has not done current research on the
death rates of Vietnam vets. But he said he sees change coming. In
September, VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said his department has begun a
study of the health impacts of the war, which he said would be
complete in about three years.

“The insight we gain from this study will help give us an
understanding of how to better serve America’s veterans,” Shinseki
said in a news release.

Death rate concerns veterans

The VA study could go far in addressing concerns of Vietnam veterans
groups who believe the war has had a devastating effect on their
health and life expectancy. Their evidence is mostly anecdotal,
though. Some experts familiar with limited data regarding veterans’
deaths say they have seen nothing that supports the charge that
Vietnam vets are dying at unusually high rates. Still, many Vietnam
veterans believe it is true.

“The Vietnam guys are going faster than the World War II guys,” said
Joe Ingino, president of the Nassau County chapter of Vietnam
Veterans of America. He said he has come to believe this from stories
he has been told across the region.

Examples on Long Island include a Medal of Honor awardee, Army Spc.
George C. Lang, who grew up in Hicksville. Lang, who was paralyzed
during a 1969 firefight, was 57 when he died of cancer five years ago.

Sharing a section of the memorial wall, known as a columbarium, in
Farmingdale are the names of Staff Sgt. Leslie Garcia, formerly of
Central Islip, who was 58 when he died of a heart attack this year,
and PV2 Angel Gonzalez, of Manhattan, who was 53 when he died in
2009. The marker for another soldier nearby – Pfc Lawrence Gilmore
was 61 when he died of a heart attack last year – reads “No more pain
beloved son and brother.”

“He was in a lot of pain,” said his mother, Eva Gilmore, of
Port Richey, Fla., who said Gilmore battled diabetes before he died.

Many veterans note with alarm that the VA this year again expanded
the list of more than a dozen diseases – including a host of cancers,
Type 2 diabetes, and ischemic heart disease – directly linked to
exposure to Agent Orange and other herbicides sprayed in Vietnam
between 1962 and 1971. A diagnosis on the list can entitle a veteran
to compensation related to a service-connected disability.

Other factors at play

Advocates say factors other than service in Vietnam also likely
undermined the health of veterans. Because returning troops were
rejected by a war-weary public, many turned inward, battling anxiety,
depression and Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome on their own, often
made worse by alcohol or drugs, experts say. And for most of the war,
troop rations included free cigarettes.

“I can’t say if his heart attack had anything to do with him being in
the war because he was a heavy smoker,” said Jocelyn McIntee, of
Greenlawn, whose husband, Eugene, served in Vietnam in the mid-1960s,
and died in 1992 when he was 49. “He really didn’t talk about it, but
do I think he came back with a lot of stress, yes. He saw a lot of
people killed, and that must have been disturbing.”

As early as 1987, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
reported that troops who had been in Vietnam were dying faster
because of risky or violent behaviors after their return.

In its 1987 Vietnam Experience Study, the CDC reported that the death
rate for U.S. troops who served in Vietnam was 1.5 times higher than
for troops who served elsewhere in the first five years after their discharge.

Violent deaths accounted for much of the increase in that study, with
Vietnam veterans twice as likely to die from car crashes, suicide and
homicide as were troops who served elsewhere during that era.

A 1996 study by Australia’s Department of Veterans Affairs showed
that Australian troops who served in Vietnam died younger than
Australian troops who served elsewhere in the same period. They were
twice as likely to die of lung cancer and three times as likely to
die of cirrhosis of the liver, the study showed.

More recent data on the rate of Vietnam veteran deaths is anything
but clear, says Mary Paxton, of the national Institute of Medicine, a
sister organization of the National Academy of Sciences that
evaluates health data for the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Paxton said studies of U.S. veterans cannot be regarded as definitive
because incomplete record-keeping by the U.S. military means
researchers cannot reliably track the health outcomes of the 2.6
million Americans who served in Vietnam.

No ‘massive die-off’

But her reading of research has convinced her that there is no
epidemic of early deaths among Vietnam vets.

“I get calls from veterans who say they are dropping like flies, but
that doesn’t seem to be the case,” Paxton said. “I think they are at
somewhat higher risk, but there is not the massive die-off that is
being claimed.”

Paxton referenced a 2004 update of the 1987 CDC study, which followed
18,313 male Army veterans.

“Death rates from disease-related chronic conditions, including
cancers and circulatory system diseases, did not differ between
Vietnam veterans and their peers,” the report said.

To families of many Vietnam veterans, the statistics only go so far,
as many now wonder whether their service in Vietnam so long ago is
threatening their lives a second time.

That’s a question that tugs at Diane Lake, who said it became clear
her husband knew he would not live past 65.

“He said, ‘Diane, I don’t have much time,’ ” she said, recalling his
words shortly before his death. “He was with us another 10 days, and
he was gone.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: